|
Quinquennial
Reports
Giles
Quarme
WILLIAM MORRIS, when
founding the Society for the Protection of Ancient Buildings in 1877,
urged 'Staving off decay by daily care'. Even before then, the Church
of England may be said to have given a lead to other guardians of historic
buildings by pioneering a system of regular inspection by a suitably qualified
architect. In the 19th Century the Church of England established the principle
of regular inspection of Parsonage House which was ultimately developed
and regularised into The Inspection of Churches Measure, 1955,
which extended this principle to provide as follows:
| Every
scheme: |
| a |
shall
provide for the establishment of a fund by means of contributions
from parochial, diocesan or other sources; |
| b |
shall
provide for the payment out of such fund or otherwise for the cost
of the inspection of churches in the diocese; |
| c |
shall
provide for the appointment of an architect or architects approved
by the Advisory Committee to inspect the churches in the diocese and
to make a report on every church inspected; |
| d |
shall
provide, in the case of every church inspected, for a copy of the
report so made to he sent to the Archdeacon of the Archdeaconry and
to the parochial church council of the parish in which the church
is situated; and |
| e |
may
contain other provisions not inconsistent with this measure as the
Dioceson Conference shall think fit. |
Curing for churches
is a specialist field. It involves many aspects of professional knowledge;
the liturgist, archaeologist, architect with special skills in repair
and conservation, art historian, archivist, conservator, artist and antiquary
all have a place in the overall picture. In addition, the role of the
local PCC and the incumbent with their professional advice is fundamental
to the welfare and safeguarding of the churches and chapels covered by
the Measure. The fact that so many of our churches survived the Middle
Ages (approximately 8,000 out of 17,000 chapels and churches in England)
is, however, due to the care and responsibility of succeeding generations
of parishioners, incumbents and professionals. It must always he remembered
that 'we are all no more than life tenants of our heritage and we hove
a moral duty to pass it on in as good a condition as that in which we
received it.'
| A
report should he produced of five-yearly intervals which identifies
records and comments on the following |
| (i) |
Repair
work or any new work carried out since the lost inspection. |
| (ii) |
The
general condition of the fabric. |
| (iii) |
The
detailed condition of the fabric, such as structural walls, roof covering,
fittings, services, monuments, and the churchyard. |
| (iv) |
Works
of repair in order of priority. |
| (v) |
Recommendations
on the maintenance and core of buildings and their contents. |
| (vi) |
Recommendations
on further detailed investigation. |
| Perhaps
the most significant part of any quinquennial report is the section
dealing with works of repair in order of priority. The works identified
in this section are categorised us follows: |
| (i) |
Of
utmost urgency. |
| (ii) |
Essential
within the next 18 months. |
| (iii) |
Essential
Within the quinquennium. |
| (iv) |
Desirable. |
The architect, when
producing his report will have had the benefit of a detailed record stretching
over many years which will record the fundamental problems inherent in
the original design of the church that cause difficulties with its maintenance.
With this advantage of hindsight many mistakes con be avoided and considerable
time saved by the architect not having to 're-invent the wheel'.
However, a word of
caution should he introduced in that, if the newly appointed architect
is over-dependent on previous analysis of a recurring problem, he may
find himself repeating his predecessor's mis-diagnosis.
Some of the works
of repair or alteration may involve disturbing important archaeological
remains. It is often forgotten that, the diocese has, at its disposal
a diocesan archaeological consultant who is available to assist and advise
the architect on his proposed works. It is not uncommon to find mediaeval
wall paintings hidden under numerous coats of whitewash when damp proofing
or new decoration schemes are taking place.
The quinquennial system
of regular survey, combined with continuous maintenance, has ensured the
survival of a unique collection of historic places of worship that in
some cases, even date back to the Anglo Saxon period. Repairing and restoring
Historic buildings is an extremely expensive operation. When major projects
occur, they place immense financial burdens on the parish, incumbent and
PCC A 'stitch in time' is a truism that has been shown to work 'miracles'
in the past and, if applied with the some care in the future, will guarantee
these places of worship for the 21st century.
|
This
article is reproduced from The Conservation and Repair of Ecclesiastical Buildings, 1994
Author
Giles
Quarme, Chartered Architect, London
Further
information
|
RELATED
ARTICLES
Programming
Repairs
RELATED
PRODUCTS AND SERVICES
Architects |
| |
© Cathedral Communications Limited 2005 |