Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  37 / 196 Next Page
Basic version Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 37 / 196 Next Page
Page Background

T W E N T Y T H I R D E D I T I O N

T H E B U I L D I N G C O N S E R VAT I O N D I R E C T O R Y 2 0 1 6

3 7

1

PROFESS IONAL SERV I CES

WATER IN PERMEABLE

BUILDING MATERIALS

ROBYN PENDER

T

HE CRITICAL

links between water

and almost every form of building

deterioration do not need repeating

here, nor does the fact that porous materials

interact closely with moisture. On the

other hand – as the various claims for

miracle remedial products make clear –

the mechanisms by which water moves into

and through building materials are not so

well understood.

Does this matter? The problem is that,

when it comes to dealing with moisture

problems, correct identification of the source

is vital: treating symptoms simply does not

work, because very different problems lead

to almost the same symptoms, and ‘feedback

loops’ are common (moisture causing damage

that lets in more moisture). To complicate

matters, the same words are used by

laboratory scientists, building investigators

and practitioners, but they are used to mean

subtly different things, and this can lead to

considerable confusion.

Although at microscopic level, the

behaviour of water and contaminants such

as salts is likely to occupy researchers for

many years to come, it is not difficult for

practitioners to develop a picture of the

processes involved at building level that is

good enough to underpin effective surveying

and remediation. This paper outlines one

such picture, based on the more detailed and

wide-ranging explanations in the Building

Environment volume of Historic England’s

Practical Building Conservation

series.

WHAT DO WE MEAN BY ‘PERMEABLE’?

It seems sensible to begin by disentangling the

words ‘permeable’, which is used technically

to describe any material through which a

particular liquid or gas can pass, and ‘porous’,

which in this context simply means that the

structure of the material includes voids or

‘pores’ (porosity being the ratio of voids to

solid matter). Not all porous materials are

permeable – if the pores are bubbles cut off

from each other, then nothing will be able to

pass through – and some may be permeable

to one liquid or gas but not another, or

permeable only under certain conditions.

The speed at which a liquid or gas can travel

through a permeable material depends to a

great extent on the shape and size of the pores,

and on how they connect with each other and

with the surface.

For materials scientists, ‘permeability’

is measured by packing a column with the

material of interest, and passing the liquid

or gas (its ‘mobile phase’) through under

pressure. For building conservators, the

mobile phase is always water (although it

may well be mixed with salts and other

contaminants), and the behaviour of single

materials is of little interest: we are concerned

with systems of multiple materials having

differing densities and porosities, with many

joints and voids; in movement of water in

every direction, not just one; and in what

happens under ordinary pressures, rather than

the extreme pressures imposed in laboratory

tests. When we speak of the ‘permeability’ of

a wall, it is this complex transfer of water that

we actually mean.

THE BEHAVIOUR OF WATER

Which, then, of the many factors involved

in moisture movement is it critical for

practitioners to understand?

Water is so familiar to us that its

strangeness is often forgotten, but its

behaviour both physically and chemically

really is peculiar. Most materials are densest

Failed remedial treatments are often based on wrong notions about the behaviour of water. The operation of Knapen tubes, for example, is based on the idea that humid air is

heavy and so will fall. In reality, humid air rises.

The structure of water molecules allows them to cling

together strongly, forming a strong ‘meniscus’.