Historic Parks and Gardens in Wales
Protection, legislation and the role of the Welsh Historic Gardens Trust
Ros Laidlaw
| |
 |
|
| |
The freshly-restored Aberglasney Mansion and Cloister Garden in June 2003 (Photo: ©Caroline Palmer) |
|
The system that protects historic parks
and gardens in Wales is significantly
different from that of England and
Scotland. Statutory responsibility for heritage
protection lies with the National Assembly
for Wales and is administered by Cadw, its
historic environment service. The Royal
Commission on the Ancient and Historical
Monuments of Wales (RCAHMW) maintains
the National Monuments Record for Wales
and the four Welsh archaeological trusts
maintain the regional Historic Environment
Records and advise on heritage management
and development control. The Welsh
Historic Gardens Trust (WHGT) is the
only amenity organisation based in Wales
specifically concerned with the protection and
conservation of historic parks and gardens.
The WHGT was set up in 1989 in
response to the very real threat to many
historic parks and gardens in Wales. Of
primary concern at the time were the historic
parks and gardens of Middleton Hall and
Aberglasney in Carmarthenshire and the
Hafod estate in Ceredigion. The trust was
instrumental in setting up the Aberglasney
Gardens Trust and the Hafod Trust, and
in establishing the Middleton estate as
the chosen site for the National Botanic
Garden of Wales. Its main aims and objectives
are to conserve, document and promote
the historic parks, gardens and designed
landscapes of Wales and to campaign for
their protection. The trust gained charitable
status in 1994 and consists of a central body
with county branches throughout Wales.
PLANNING POLICY IN WALES
The current strategic planning guidance,
Planning Policy Wales (2002), supplemented by
a series of technical advisory notes (TANs),
recognises the importance of protecting
the historic environment, encompassing
archaeology and ancient monuments, listed
buildings, conservation areas and historic parks,
gardens and landscapes. The contribution
of the historic environment to the Welsh
Assembly Government’s wider strategic
objectives is set out in Wales: A Better Country,
The Wales Spatial and Environment Strategy. There
is also the imperative (introduced in 2009) for
Design and Access statements to accompany
planning applications which can and should
provide the opportunity for outlining
historic context and represents a positive
step by the Welsh Assembly Government.
Local planning authorities are required
by Planning Policy Wales (2002) to protect
sites listed on the Cadw/ICOMOS Register of
Parks and Gardens of Special Historic Interest
in Wales (para 6.5.23). The register consists
of six main volumes, published between
1994 and 2002, and a supplementary
volume published in 2007. As in England
and Scotland, the inclusion of a site on the
register offers no statutory protection, but
para 6.5.23 of PPW (2002) states that:
The effect of proposed development on a park or
garden contained in the Register of Landscapes,
Parks and Gardens of Special Historic Interest
in Wales, or on the setting of such a park or
garden, may be a material consideration in the
determination of a planning application.
Inclusion in the Cadw/ICOMOS Register is at the discretion of the owners and
currently about 30 sites have been omitted
from the register at their owners’ requests.
A feature of the register, unique to Wales,
is the identification of the Essential Setting of a listed site which is a concept developed to:
safeguard areas adjacent to the historic parks and
gardens which, although outside them, form an
essential part of their immediate background and
without which, in their present state, the historic
character of the site in question would be diluted and
damaged.
| |
 |
| |
Middleton: the National Botanic Garden of Wales. The dome of the great glasshouse rears out of the landscape. In the
foreground the formerly neglected walled kitchen garden was laid out in 2004 to display plants according to their taxonomic
affinities. (Photo: ©Caroline Palmer) |
| |
 |
| |
Hafod: walkers enjoy the 18th Century Ystwyth Gorge Walk, made accessible in 2002 by the restoration of the original
chain bridge. (Photo: ©Caroline Palmer) |
Interpretation in a planning context
of the extent of the setting has proved to be
flexible in response to the scale and nature
of the impact of proposed development.
One such important precedent was
set in the planning inquiry into the appeal
against the refusal of planning permission
to site a windfarm in the vicinity of the
Grade I site of Margam Park, Port Talbot
(2003). The inspector refused the appeal
concluding that the turbines would have a
major effect upon the park’s setting despite
being located beyond the outer limit of
the park’s essential setting. The inspector
accepted that the Essential Setting was an
area of particular sensitivity outside the
registered area, but that did not mean that
‘all development outside the Essential Setting,
of whatever nature, must therefore be regarded
as not affecting either the park or its setting’.
THE CONSULTATION PROCESS
The consultation procedure for planning
applications affecting register sites in
Wales differs fundamentally from that in
England and Scotland. Currently, voluntary
arrangements exist for consultation with Cadw
and the Garden History Society on planning
applications affecting parks and gardens and
their settings on the register (PPW 2002 para
6.5.23). Local planning authorities are asked
to consult Cadw on planning applications
impacting Grade I and II* sites and the
Garden History Society (GHS) on applications
impacting all parks and gardens on the register
(Welsh Office Circular 61/96, Annex B). This
arrangement has had unintended consequences,
not least because the GHS no longer
employs a case officer in Wales and therefore
no longer responds directly to planning
applications affecting sites on the register.
As the Welsh Historic Gardens Trust
has effectively taken over the role of the
GHS in Wales, an arrangement has been
established whereby the WHGT is indirectly
informed of planning applications referred
to the GHS; but delays can ensue.
Ideally, all planning applications to
local planning authorities (LPAs) require
weekly monitoring by Cadw and amenity
bodies such as the GHS and Welsh Historic
Gardens Trust as unfortunately not all LPAs
actively seek consultation. The work of
WHGT branch conservation officers and
the central co-ordinator is undertaken on
a purely voluntary basis; there has been
no government funding to date. The task
is demanding, particularly where branches
have to cover several LPAs. The posting
of weekly planning application lists and
documents online has speeded up this process.
However, delays may ensue if documents
have to be requested, or if a trip must be
made to the planning offices to view plans.
The trust has a central conservation
committee to co-ordinate casework and responses by all the trust branches. Detailed
local knowledge within the branches has been
demonstrated to be of vital importance when
identifying planning applications posing a
potential threat. Some branches have been
regularly monitoring and responding to
planning applications since the introduction of
protection and have established a good working
relationship with planning departments.
Cadw, the key party on historic
environment matters, because of its unique
and somewhat ambiguous role, cannot object
but only make comments on planning
applications. There is a real danger that, even
though Cadw may strongly advise against a
proposal, a lack of formal objection could be
interpreted as support for the application.
In the recent Government White Paper
Heritage Protection for the 21st Century the
role of the WHGT was acknowledged. The
paper proposed statutory consultation
and included the WHGT as a statutory
consultee in respect of planning applications
affecting registered parks and gardens. As in
England, the proposals included simplifying
the current national designation system for
buildings, parks and gardens and ancient
monuments with a new unified system, but
with no change in the selection criteria or
grading systems within Wales. However,
this legislation was not included on the last
Queen’s List and is unlikely to be introduced
to the statute book in the near future.
PROTECTION OF NON-REGISTER SITES
The Welsh Historic Gardens Trust also has
a role in highlighting and responding to
planning applications affecting gardens of
local importance and vulnerable non-register
sites not within the protected setting of a
listed building, scheduled ancient monument
or a conservation area. Several branches
have compiled county inventories of parks,
gardens and designed landscapes of historic
importance. In some cases the trust has been
involved in campaigns to spot list sites at risk.
Research was concentrated initially on
potential registerable sites in areas where
the register had not yet been published.
In Ceredigion, where the register did not
appear until 2002, sites under threat were
prioritised for recording and research.
One such was Trawscoed, which lacked
adequate protection at the time of its
proposed sale by a government agency to
a private buyer. A tree survey carried out
in 1994 formed the basis of a Woodland
Protection Order safeguarding important
18th and 19th century tree plantings.
WHGT has been able to make a
unique contribution to conservation
in Wales. As a result of the in-depth
research carried out by its members, it
is capable of responding promptly and
knowledgeably to planning applications.
Lack of maintenance, wilful or unwitting
destruction of garden features and divided
ownership can all pose a threat to historic
gardens. The local vigilance of WHGT
branch conservation officers is one of the
few safeguards in identifying such threats.
DEVELOPMENT PLANS
Decisions made by county councils on land-use planning in Wales are plan-led: that is
to say they should reflect the policies set out
in local and regional development plans,
which, in turn, should reflect the policy of the
Welsh Assembly Government. It is therefore
vital for the safeguarding of historic parks
and gardens that there are strong policies
within these plans offering them protection.
Effective responses to planning applications
depend upon the strength of these policies.
Currently many local authorities still operate
under the policies of Unitary Development
Plans (UDP) or its predecessor the Local
Plan. Now each county council is required
under the provisions of the Planning and
Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 to produce a
Local Development Plan (LDP). Currently
we are in a period of transition in which
some local authorities are still working on
the preparation of a UDP while others have
already started on the preparation of an LDP.
| |
 |
| |
Aerial view of Grade I listed Faenol Estate situated west of Bangor overlooking the Menai Straits. The inclusion of a business
use designation in the Gwynedd Unitary Development Plan for the core of the estate was refused at a public inquiry in 2009.
(Photo: Crown copyright RCAHMS) |
The branches of the Welsh Historic
Gardens Trust have participated in the
consultation process in the preparation of
local plans and UDPs and as a result effective
policies are in place in many development
plans. The trust is now taking an active role
in the consultation process for the preparation
of LDPs and, with its locally-based branches,
is in a strong position to make informed
contributions to achieve protection of
historic parks and gardens in Wales.
In some cases land-use designations
in these development plans have been
successfully contested. A notable example was
Gwynedd County Council’s UDP proposal
for applying a business use designation to the
core of the historic Faenol estate. The trust
held the view that business development
would have greatly harmed the Grade I
park and the setting of the historic listed
buildings and Faenol Conservation Area. The
inspector agreed, ruling that the proposed allocation of land for business development
be deleted from the Deposit Draft of the
UDP. The inspector considered that the
proposed business development, even
in combination with landscape planting,
would very significantly erode the spacious
setting of the conservation area and would
neither preserve nor enhance its character or
appearance in line with the objectives of PPW.
ENABLING DEVELOPMENT
Another recent planning inquiry in which
the trust was involved concerned Ruperra
Castle near Caerphilly. This case highlights
the complex threat posed by enabling
development, development which would
usually be considered contrary to policy
being granted planning permission to
enable the owners to fund vital repair work
to some historic fabric. In the absence
of comparable guidance from Cadw, the
policy statements and guidelines issued by
English Heritage Enabling Development and
the Conservation of Heritage Assets (2008) are
requested to be adopted in any planning
response concerning enabling development.
The underlying remit of these guidelines
is that significant damage to the historic
asset must not outweigh the gain.
Ruperra Castle’s garden is Grade II
listed the Cadw Register, the primary reason
being that it represents:
the survival of an
unusual early Jacobean mock castle of exceptional
historical significance with its attendant deer park
and structural remains of contemporary formal
gardens (Glamorgan Register).
The castle
itself is also a scheduled ancient monument
and Grade II* listed building within a
conservation area. It might thus be considered
worthy of the highest level of protection.
The owner submitted an application
for refurbishing the castle, outbuildings
and ancillary works for residential
purposes which included the construction
of 18 new dwellings and an access road. Caerphilly County Borough Council’s
planners advised their planning committee
to approve the enabling development
despite widespread objections from the
community, heritage bodies and amenity
groups. The planning committee listened to
the objections and refused the application,
and the owner subsequently appealed.
 |
 |
| Above left: Aerial view of Ruperra Castle and its grounds in the 1930s. Enabling development, refused on appeal, would have blocked
views out from the castle to its parkland, shown at the top of the photograph. Also, the U-shaped outbuilding would have
been doubled in size. (Photo: Ruperra Castle Preservation Trust). Above right: The formal terraces at Ruperra Castle, which were well-maintained from 1898 until 1934 by the head gardener, Angus
McKinnon. The Grade II listed glasshouse at the rear was designed by Mackenzie and Moncur Ltd. Enabling development,
refused on appeal, proposed a pair of residential buildings flanking the glasshouse range to be accessed by a driveway piercing
through the garden wall behind. (Photo: Ruperra Castle Preservation Trust) |
At the public inquiry the Welsh Historic
Gardens Trust submitted that the application
had not been accompanied by applications
for listed building or scheduled monument
consent and therefore the impact of the
proposals on their special interest was not
clear. The trust held that the application
would have a harmful impact on the
protected landscape, both on the immediate
environs of the castle and its relationship to
its parkland setting. It was argued that the
development was in conflict with approved
policies of the Caerphilly Borough Council’s
Unitary Development Plan. The appeal was
refused on the grounds that 'harm to matters
of public interest would far outweigh the benefits
of the proposed development'. More specifically,
the final ministerial decision, which
followed the inspector’s recommendations,
concluded that the proposed development
would not preserve the setting of the listed
buildings on the site and would not preserve
or enhance the character of the Ruperra
Park and Castle Conservation Area.
Although participation in public inquiries
has led to some notable successes, they are
costly, both in money and volunteer time,
particularly for amenity organisations such
as the Welsh Historic Gardens Trust which
are reliant on donations and membership
subscriptions to cover costs. Sharing these
costs with other heritage bodies, or the
donation of professional expertise can help,
but there is a limit to how many public
inquiries can be financed in any one year.
LOOKING FORWARD
As in England and Scotland there is, as yet,
no statutory protection for historic parks and
gardens on the Register, but in Wales there
is the added disadvantage that consultation
arrangements with Cadw and amenity
bodies on planning applications affecting
register sites are currently voluntary and not
statutory. Even more vulnerable are those
non-register sites that are of predominantly
local importance, but are not the setting of a
listed building, scheduled ancient monument
or conservation area. Encouragement of the
understanding and appreciation of historic
designed landscapes through heritage
government bodies such as Cadw and the
Royal Commission, the archaeological trusts
and amenity organisations such as the Welsh
Historic Gardens Trust will do much to raise
their profile within the wider community.
~~~
Further Information
The following Welsh Assembly Government
planning policy documents can be
downloaded from www.wales.gov.uk or can
be obtained from its Publications Centre,
Room 3.022, Welsh Assembly Government,
Cathays Park, Cardiff CF10 2NQ:
Planning Policy Wales 2002
Welsh Office Circular 61/96
Ministerial Interim Planning Policy
Statement 01/2008 on Good Design
Technical Advice Notes
Planning Your Community: A Guide
to Local Development Plans
The White Paper – Heritage Protection for
the 21st Century can be downloaded from
Cadw's website here
The Registers of Landscapes, Parks and Gardens
of Special Historic Interest in Wales can be
obtained from Cadw, Welsh Assembly
Government, Plas Carew, Unit 5/7 Cefn Coed,
Parc Nantgarw, Cardiff CF15 7QQ. The
text entries of individual sites can be
downloaded from the Coflein database on the
RCAHMW website www.rcahmw.gov.uk.
For more information about the Welsh
Historic Gardens Trust visit www.whgt.org.uk or contact its office at The Bothy,
Aberglasney, Llangathen, Carms SA32 8QH.
|