Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  179 / 208 Next Page
Basic version Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 179 / 208 Next Page
Page Background

T W E N T Y S E C O N D E D I T I O N

T H E B U I L D I N G C O N S E R VAT I O N D I R E C T O R Y 2 0 1 5

1 7 7

INTER IORS

5

blue and manganese for purple. After

dipping the biscuit tile into the tin glaze

and allowing it to dry, the decorator could

then apply the design by hand painting in

blue or purple glaze directly onto the dipped,

unfired surface.

The tile was then ready for a second

firing of up to 800°c. Repeated patterns

were achieved using ‘pouncing’, a method

of tracing designs onto tiles by drawing the

outline of the design onto paper and then

making pinpricks at regular intervals along

the lines of the pattern. The perforated

design is then placed over a tile and dusted

with burnt bone or charcoal, transferring a

dotted outline of the pattern onto the tile.

Because the pattern is only transferred in

outline no two tiles are exactly alike. The

charm of Delft tiles lies in this elegant

variation, in the ease and swiftness of the

hand-drawn design and in the way that the

blues and purples migrate into the white

background during firing (see page 176).

In Liverpool, in 1756, John Sadler and

Guy Green introduced the technique of

transfer printing onto tiles which produced

an entirely different style of decoration

formed by a printed outline transferred

from a copper plate engraving fired onto the

surface of the tin glaze. This allowed repeated

intricate designs to be printed onto tiles at

great speed. While transfer printing later

became a mainstay of decoration for the

pottery industry as a whole, no other tile-

makers followed suit at the time.

INHERENT DEFECTS

Delft tiles in dairies and kitchens were for the

most part swept away in favour of the new,

more robust Victorian tile. Those that remain

are usually conserved with great care or taken

away to be displayed as ‘art’ pieces. In the UK,

Delft tiles are rarely found undisturbed in

their original location in significant numbers.

The chief failure of Delft tiles is the

inherent problem of the glaze sufficiently

melding with the clay body to form a single

robust entity. The glaze and body too often

shrank at different rates when cooling from

the kiln resulting in the glaze ‘crazing’

(forming a network of fine cracks) and flaking

away from the body. The resulting clay

body, in ceramic terms, would be described

as ‘soft’, meaning that it tends towards high

porosity, friability – particularly around the

edges – and easy fragmentation. Much of

the conservation work on 17th- and 18th-

century tiles is associated with consolidation

of damage directly resulting from the

manufacturing technique.

The soft body of the tile is particularly

prone to moisture absorption, which in turn

can result in efflorescence caused by salt

crystallisation. Salt crystal growth can force

the glaze to become detached from the tile

body. This is a well-known and understood

problem with soft-body ceramic objects.

Moisture absorption also leads to the ready

ingress of stains into the tile body, particularly

if tiles have been used in fireplace surrounds.

The glaze itself is also soft and will

readily become worn on the surface, losing

the case of 18th-century tile work because the

lime plaster used as a fixative often contained

gypsum, which is particularly prone to

salt action where there are prevalent damp

conditions. The only remedy in this situation

is to create an ambient environment with a

relative humidity no greater than 60 per cent,

which will prevent crystallisation.

the typical soft shine which tin glaze

produces and again leaving the glaze open to

absorption of dirt.

GUIDANCE ON CONSOLIDATION,

CLEANING AND REPAIR

The most damaging and frequently

encountered inappropriate repair is the use

of Portland cement either to reinstate loose

tiles or to install them in a new location

following the failure of the original lime

plaster fixative.

The relative hardness, lack of plasticity

and ability to hold soluble salts all combine

to make the use of Portland cement as an

adhesive for Delft tiles highly damaging.

Little can be done to reverse the use of

cement without the loss of original tile

material.

Cleaning

Delft tiles can be cleaned using a solution of

de-ionised water and a neutral pH detergent

such as Synperonic A. Usually, a moistened

soft cloth is sufficient to clean the glaze but

particular attention can be paid to dirty

grout lines using a tooth brush. Buffing to a

shine with a dry soft cotton cloth brings out

the soft lustre of the glaze. If tiles are over-

wetted there is a danger that crystallisation

of soluble salts may take place, and if loose

tiles are soaked over a period of time in

distilled water to remove salts or staining,

care must be taken to dry the tiles quickly

and thoroughly.

Organic staining, such as soot, if left

alone, will continue to migrate into the tile

body. Removing organic and iron oxide

staining is difficult and requires the expertise

of a ceramic conservator.

Site-related problems

Lime plaster was used to fix tiles during

the 18th century and it is usually found to

be fractured behind the tiles (below right).

Shrinkage at the time of drying causes a

complex polygonal matrix of fractures to

form which can cause the tiles to sound

hollow or to rattle when tapped, but it may

not be problematic if the tiles are adhered

and the grout between the tiles is sound.

Fireplaces

It is quite common to find 18th-century

tiles in fireplace surrounds. The severe loss

of glaze surface on hearth tiles due to wear

cannot be repaired. Impact damage such

as fractures can be repaired using normal

ceramic restoration techniques especially if

the tile is also loose from its setting.

The most common problem is soot

blackening at the edges of tiles. The worst

effects of this can usually be removed as

described above but often the best option is to

remove and replace the old grout altogether.

Salt crystallisation

Salt crystallisation is a well understood

problem. In damp conditions, chemical

changes resulting from salt crystallisation

degrade lime plaster causing it to soften and

crumble. The problem can be exacerbated in

Tile panel, Triana, Seville, Spain

Typical use of Delft tiles surrounding a fireplace in

the UK

Hand painted images in cobalt and manganese

Lime plaster adhesive which has shrunk and

fractured while drying