Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  156 / 208 Next Page
Basic version Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 156 / 208 Next Page
Page Background

1 5 4

T H E B U I L D I N G C O N S E R VAT I O N D I R E C T O R Y 2 0 1 5

T W E N T Y S E C O N D E D I T I O N

SERV I CES & TREATMENT :

PROTEC T I ON & REMED I AL TREATMENT

4.1

binders are available, from high calcium lime

(with or without additives such as pozzolans

to enhance performance) to natural hydraulic

limes (NHLs) graded from 2 to 5 based on

strength, to suit various exposures.

For both indents and mortar repairs the

damaged surface must be carefully prepared.

Lack of surface preparation and lack of

adequate reinforcement or armature are two

of the most common causes of failure of past

repairs. The stone surface should be cut back

to sufficient depth that the indent or mortar

will remain safely in place and the edges of

the repair cavity undercut to hold the repair.

Although it is often possible in the case of

larger indent repairs to use mechanical (disc)

cutters to remove the bulk of the damaged

stone, the final dressing of the repair cavity,

the back and sides, should be done by hand

with sharp masonry chisels to form well-cut,

neat edges to the repair. The interface between

a stone indent and repaired stone should be

very fine, not a masonry joint, for maximum

durability. Good indent repairs require a high

level of masonry skill. Trials and exemplars

should be part of any repair contract to ensure

at the outset that the required standard can

be achieved. Historic indent repairs of very

high quality are often found on historic

masonry buildings, and are testament to what

is possible. These historic repairs often have a

curved profile, following the edge of a defect to

minimise repair size and avoid the mechanical

appearance that can result when indents are

cut square.

The following general rules should be

observed when carrying out historic masonry

repairs:

• Historic masonry joints must be followed

in all repair and replacement work. If

repairs bridge masonry joints, evidence

of the original construction (joint details)

will be lost, and there is a risk of the

repair fracturing along the joint lines.

• Stone indents to exposed edges, for

example on the nosings of cornices,

steps, and copings, should be

dovetailed in place to secure them.

• In general, indent repairs should be

anchored by dowels (normally corrosion

resistant stainless steel or phosphor

bronze) inserted into fine drillings into

the indent and the back of the repair

cavity, and bonded with resin designed for

this application. Resin should be used in

the drilling only and not smeared across

the stone surfaces at the interface.

• Lime grout is the appropriate material

for bonding the stone interface,

which must be completely filled to

avoid rainwater penetration using

grout specifically designed to suit the

exposure, stone type and colour.

• Both stone indents and replacement

stones should follow the original

profile of mouldings as far as these can

be determined. This can be difficult

with weathered surfaces and evidence

should be sought in the least weathered

areas and profiles recorded onto a

permanent template, such as zinc.

• Mechanical saw marks on stone faces are

completely out of character and should not

be accepted. Stone repair faces should be

finished by hand and dressed to replicate

original tool marks of the historic masonry.

• Masonry joints finished as part of

stone repair and replacement work

should also be visually and physically

compatible with the existing.

Provided these general rules are followed to a

high standard using good masonry skills, repair

work, and in particular indent repairs, should

provide a good long term solution and enhance

rather than detract from the historic masonry.

Recommended Reading

G Allen et al,

Hydraulic Lime Mortar for

Stone, Brick and Block Masonry,

Donhead,

Shaftesbury, 2003

J Ashurst and FG Dimes,

Conservation of

Building and Decorative Stone,

Butterworth-

Heinemann, Oxford, 1998

British Standards Institution,

BS 8221-1:2012

Code of Practice for Cleaning and Surface

Repair of Buildings

, BSI, London, 2012

Ian Brocklebank (ed),

Building Limes in

Conservation

, Donhead, Shaftesbury, 2012

English Heritage,

Practical Building

Conservation: Stone,

Ashgate, Farnham, 2012

CATHERINEWOOLFITT

ACR MIfA is a

conservator and archaeologist specialising

in the care and conservation of ancient

monuments and historic buildings, with

particular emphasis on architectural detail

and sculpture in stone, fired clay and lime

based materials. She holds MA degrees in

classical archaeology and art conservation

and has worked in private practice since 1999.

She established Catherine Woolfitt Associates

(see page 38)

in 2008 and provides technical

advice, consultancy and teaching services in

the conservation of the built heritage.

Dentils in a cornice which had been poorly repaired in the past, with machine

cut dentils that were larger than the originals and inadequately bonded to the

underlying stone with resin and some metal dowels.

After removing the failed replacements, the stone was dressed back to enable a

more effective indent repair with a new section of dentils worked as a single piece

of stone.

The new indent unit loosely slotted into the repair cavity, ready for fixing

The finished piece after fixing with new stainless steel dowels and grouting at the

interface