Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  17 / 208 Next Page
Basic version Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 17 / 208 Next Page
Page Background

T W E N T Y S E C O N D E D I T I O N

T H E B U I L D I N G C O N S E R VAT I O N D I R E C T O R Y 2 0 1 5

1 5

1

PROFESS IONAL SERV I CES

rear gardens of Grade II listed buildings

along South Bailey, lies adjacent to the

Grade I listed Durham Castle walls and the

world heritage site, and is located within

the Durham Conservation Area. This

context imposed a number of constraints

on the design of the proposed buildings. In

particular, there was a need to respect the

scale, pattern and hierarchy of the existing

built form and castle walls. Furthermore,

the impact of the development, sitting on

the edge of a plateau above the River Wear,

needed to be considered in important views

from the south and east.

All these factors were relevant to the

preservation of the character and appearance

of the Durham Conservation Area and the

setting of the Durham Castle and Cathedral

World Heritage Site.

In the UK there over 460,000 listed

buildings, almost 34,000 scheduled

monuments, over 11,000 conservation areas

as well as numerous registered historic parks

and gardens, registered historic battlefields,

designated wrecks and world heritage

sites. Only a minority of these will require

conservation management plans, but every

historic site facing development works needs

some form of heritage appraisal in order to

inform sensitive management and change.

Flexibility in approach is critical to

success, as each report must be tailored to

the needs of the site and its owner and should

respond to practical constraints such as

the available budget, the timescale and the

nature and scale of the site and proposed

conservation or development works. The

current system of heritage protection was

never intended as a permanent barrier to

change: its aim is to ensure that change is

positive and responds sensitively to the special

interest of our collective historic environment.

Conservation and heritage statements are

often crucial to achieving positive outcomes.

Recommended Reading

Ancient Monuments and Archaeological

Areas Act 1979

(England, Wales and

Scotland)

K Clark,

Informed Conservation:

Understanding Historic Buildings and

Their Landscapes for Conservation

,

English Heritage, 2001

K Clark,

Conservation Plans in Action:

Proceedings of the Oxford Conference

,

English Heritage, 1999

N Doggett and S Eydmann, ‘Heritage

Protection in Britain’,

The Building

Conservation Directory

, Cathedral

Communications Ltd, Tisbury, 2007

English Heritage,

Conservation Principles,

Policies and Guidance for the Sustainable

Management of the Historic Environment

,

London, 2008

C Mynors,

Listed Buildings, Conservation

Areas & Monuments, 4th Edition

, Sweet &

Maxwell, London, 2006

J Semple Kerr,

Conservation Plan, 7th Edition

,

Australia ICOMOS, 2013

GLOSSARY

The following definitions are set out in the

National Planning Policy Framework or,

in the case of heritage values, in English

Heritage’s Conservation Principles, Policies

and Guidance:

CONSERVATION (FOR HERITAGE POLICY)

The process of maintaining and managing

change to a heritage asset in a way that

sustains and, where appropriate, enhances its

significance.

HERITAGE ASSET

A building, monument, site,

place, area or landscape identified as having a

degree of significance meriting consideration

in planning decisions, because of its heritage

interest. Heritage asset includes designated

heritage assets and assets identified by the local

planning authority (including local listing).

HERITAGE VALUES

Aspects of worth or

importance that have been attached to places

Significance (for heritage policy) The value of

a heritage asset to this and future generations

because of its heritage interest. That interest

may be archaeological, architectural, artistic

or historic. Significance derives not only from

a heritage asset’s physical presence, but also

from its setting.

LIZ HUMBLE

is the principal at Humble

Heritage. In addition to preparing

conservation and heritage statements, she

is consultant archaeologist to Ripon and

Sheffield cathedrals. The projects described

in this article were undertaken by Woodhall

Planning and Conservation

(see page 41)

.

KEY DIFFERENCES

CONTENT

APPLICATION

Heritage

significance

Conservation

management

Conservation

management

plans

Detailed

assessment

Detailed guidance

with policies and

action plans

• Ongoing management of

complex heritage assets

• Required for HLF grants >£2m

Conservation

statements

Detailed

assessment

General

detailed where

relevant

Similar to above, suitable for less

complex sites or where no major

development is envisaged

Heritage

statements

General

detailed where

relevant

Focus on impact of

specific proposals

on the heritage

identified

One-off requirement for:

• LBC and SMC applications

• Planning applications affecting

designated heritage assets or

demolition of non-designated

heritage assets

Terracotta detailing to the facade of Lincoln Constitutional Club (1895, Grade II):

a conservation statement guided proposals for development of this vacant site,

which had fallen into very poor condition.

A heritage statement for St John’s College, Durham (early 18th century,

Grade II/II*) formed part of a successful application to secure planning

permission and listed building consent for the erection of two accommodation

blocks on this sensitive site inside a conservation area and adjacent to the

Durham Castle and Cathedral World Heritage Site.