Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  130 / 196 Next Page
Basic version Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 130 / 196 Next Page
Page Background

1 3 0

T H E B U I L D I N G C O N S E R VAT I O N D I R E C T O R Y 2 0 1 6

T W E N T Y T H I R D E D I T I O N

3.4

STRUCTURE & FABR I C :

EXTERNAL WORKS

abrasive ‘blasting’ we are exposing the iron

in the same way as when it came out of the

mould after casting, although it is rarely

filled or sealed as effectively or as quickly. The

porosity of iron is a result of tiny gas bubbles

rising to the surface as the iron cools, leaving a

way in for moisture and allowing it to become

trapped under subsequent coatings. There are

many sophisticated and specialised modern

coatings for external use which are formulated

for use on steel which, unlike cast iron, does

not have any significant porosity issues. Many

coatings manufacturers see all ferrous metals

as the same, but the key is understanding

the complexities of the specific material in

question.

Surface preparation

Conservation projects of this nature are rare

so the team faced new challenges that resulted

in opportunities to develop solutions and

improve the process of metal conservation.

At the workshop each of the items, many of

which had stood saturated for years, was dry-

blast cleaned using crushed garnet, a natural

mineral widely used as a substitute for silica

sand in sand blasting. These components

were then placed in a low relative humidity

environment, in preparation for coating.

Some light gingering is to be expected due

to ambient moisture but it is easily removed.

However, in this case, black spots began

to erupt after a short time. The spots were

magnetite suspended in deoxygenated water

and because they reappeared after each

attempt to remove them, proper drying was

necessary. Items were placed in a custom-

made oven to dry over five hours after dry

blast cleaning. The worst affected pieces had

to be fired up to three times.

Temperature, humidity and timing

Many coatings manufacturers specify a

temperature range within which products

should be applied but they seldom refer to

humidity levels. Treating bare iron in an

uncontrolled environment during the British

winter has little chance of long-term success.

Unless humidity and temperature can be

controlled accurately, both in preparation

and application, modern coatings are

susceptible to failure. On the Grand Fountain

project small sections at a time were tightly

encapsulated using a proprietary system.

The area was blast-cleaned, warmed and

dehumidified to the optimum level, then

coated. Only in these circumstances will such

systems be effective for long periods.

Experimentation and application of

coatings, gilding and lacquer

Achieving the effect of Daniel Cottier’s

coloured glazes was perhaps the biggest

challenge. The colour scheme was based

on two main dark, rich colours: a deep

red-brown and a dark green. This was

lightened by bright, solid colour highlights,

gilding and overlaid glazes of bronzed

or gold-rich translucent varnishes. This

is achieved by adding bronze powder in

varying amounts to the first varnish mix.

The technique of applying bronze and

gold in powder form over wet varnish was a

skill developed by Lost Art and was varied

deliberately on repeat components. The

bronzing technique was used on various

elements of the fountain but particularly those

where reflected light would have an effect,

such as on the underside of the bowls. In this

case bronze and ‘gold’ dust was blown over

a varnished green paint coating repeatedly

until the effect was built up. To stay true to the

19th-century approach, no modern equipment

was used (other than a pair of healthy lungs).

Research showed that gold leaf had been

used to accentuate key parts of the structure.

To ensure the vision was re-created as

accurately as possible, the herons and the tulip

to the top of the structure are today finished

in the same way.

THE COATINGS

Following a test assembly of the fountain

in the workshop, the individual castings

were painted. Different parts of the

fountain required different coatings.

The pool floor plates, for example, were

primed with a 50/50 mix of zinc phosphate

and chlorinated rubber then coated

with 100 per cent chlorinated rubber to

ensure prolonged resistance to water.

The coating solution finally agreed upon

for the main body of the fountain was two

coats of zinc phosphate primer, one coat of

two-pack polyurethane (2 pk PU) undercoat,

two or more coats of 2 pk PU gloss and one

coat of 2 pk PU varnish, holding the gold or

bronze glazes as required, then a final coat of

clear 2 pk PU varnish.

This hardwearing coating system can

be removed if required and is therefore

‘reversible.’ However, it is vital that it keys well

to the (dried) iron and remains flexible during

expansion and contraction. This was why

such an expensive system was chosen over

epoxy paint systems, which are more rigid and

therefore arguably much less suitable for cast

iron.

TRANSPORT TO SITE AND REASSEMBLY

Great care was taken during packing

and transportation to the site to avoid

damage. The fountain was pre-assembled

in large sections in the workshop prior to

transport to site for final assembly. Soft

strops were used to tie the castings down

to minimise damage to the paintwork.

Castings were then checked on-site for

any damage and the final touches were hand

painted on site as part of the final assembly

process.

Original colours and protective coatings

were an intrinsic part of traditional cast iron

structures and can tell us much about the

technology and aesthetics of the era. It is

always worth investigating what lies beneath

modern, flaking paint – you never know what

you might find.

Further Information

Historic Scotland,

Short Guide 4:

Maintenance and Repair Techniques for

Traditional Cast Iron

, Edinburgh, 2013

(http://conservation.historic-scotland.gov.uk/

cast-iron-short-guide.pdf)

AUTHORS:

This article was written by Ali

Davey and Elaine Troup with the assistance

of James Mitchell of Industrial Heritage

Consulting Ltd and Daniel Lea, Production

Manager, Lost Art Limited.

ALI DAVEY

is

Project Manager, Historic Environment

Scotland

(ali.davey@scot.gov

).

ELAINE

TROUP

is Regeneration and Conservation

Officer, Renfrewshire Council (elaine.troup@

renfrewshire.gov.uk)

Reassembly of the restored fountain