Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  137 / 196 Next Page
Basic version Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 137 / 196 Next Page
Page Background

T W E N T Y T H I R D E D I T I O N

T H E B U I L D I N G C O N S E R VAT I O N D I R E C T O R Y 2 0 1 6

1 3 7

SERV I CES & TREATMENT :

PROTEC T I ON & REMED I AL TREATMENT

4.1

materials. Successful repairs rely on matching

the properties of the repair material to those of

the existing historic fabric as closely as possible.

However, an additional set of requirements is

often imposed by the environment, adding a

degree of complexity to the process. Mortars

used in areas of high exposure are subjected

to more aggressive weathering agents such

as strong winds, wind-driven rain, frost

and percolating water. Specifying mortars

for pointing at high level (for example in

wall-heads, parapets and chimneys), where

these extreme conditions are encountered

more frequently, poses more challenges. The

problems posed by environmental conditions

should be considered at the specification stage

and, in most cases, the design of a mortar can

be modified to take account of the specific

challenges posed. There are a number of

features of mix design and preparation that can

be considered in tackling the specific problems

encountered in high exposure environments,

and these are outlined below.

AVOIDING FROST DAMAGE

Exposure of mortars to low temperatures and

frost can lead to freeze-thaw damage, causing

the mortar to fail or ‘burst’. Carbonation

of lime mortar is key in minimising frost

damage. Carbonation and drying reduce pore

water and promote the formation of a network

of pores which gives the mortar a level of

resistance or tolerance to the expansive forces

imposed during freezing conditions. Where

environmental conditions inhibit carbonation

(such as in very wet areas) the use of a

hydraulic lime is more appropriate. Hydraulic

mortars have a more rapid strength-gain

achieved via the hydration of calcium- and

aluminium-silicates.

Whether using hydraulic or non-hydraulic

limes, mortar resistance to frost damage can

be enhanced by several ways, such as the use

of a calcitic aggregate or a hot lime mix, or

simply by controlling the temperature while it

carbonates.

Calcitic aggregates

The use of calcitic aggregates such as

crushed limestone and oyster shell has been

shown to aid carbonation. These materials

act as seeding agents in the mix providing

nucleation sites for the precipitation of calcite

crystals, promoting the carbonation process.

The purity, crystallinity, particle size and

quantity of seeding agents all impact their

performance. Finely ground pure sources of

calcium carbonate (substituted for aggregate)

in concentrations above six per cent have been

found to positively impact carbonation and

strength development.

Hot lime mortars

Making a mortar by mixing water and

aggregate with quicklime, rather than with

previously slaked hydrated lime, produces

an exothermic reaction that generates heat.

The combination of heat and high alkalinity

experienced during the mixing of these

hot lime mortars is believed to produce

a more durable mortar. Microstructural

changes seen in these mortars are likely to

be beneficial, enhancing its durability. In

particular, mortars which have been laid

shortly after slaking have been shown to have

more interconnected voids (see petrographic

image above left), perhaps as a result of the

steam. This void structure would increase

the mortar’s tolerance to frost damage. It has

also been speculated that the combination

of heat and alkalinity leads to an ‘etching’ of

the surface of aggregate grains, creating a

stronger bond than would be achievable in

mortars mixed with previously slaked lime,

although this remains unverified.

Temperature control

Protection of mortar following application

can play an important role in preventing, or

at least minimising, freeze-thaw damage,

allowing the mortar to cure sufficiently before

it is exposed to harsh conditions. The use of

lime mortars in temperatures of 5ºC or below

is not recommended and following application

it is advisable to cover mortar with layers of

hessian and tarpaulin (or other protective

materials). Heated scaffold systems can provide

a solution to the problem of frost damage but

this is not always a practical or economically

viable approach. Where temperatures are not

controlled adequately, it could also lead to other

problems such as the mortar drying too rapidly.

EXPOSURE TO DRIVING RAIN

Mortars used for pointing at high level are

more exposed to rainfall than those at a

lower level which are better sheltered from

the elements, particularly where they are

protected by drip detailing. Furthermore,

projecting elements such as chimneys and

parapets have more than one face exposed.

The continuous percolation of water through

mortar will lead to the dissolution and

re-deposition (or ‘re-precipitation’) of lime

binder (illustrated above). Although this

usually occurs on a small scale it can result in

a material that lacks uniformity, being weak

and friable in some areas and much denser in

others. When the binder re-precipitates, this

can partially block pores (see petrographic

image above right) and is likely to reduce the

breathability of the mortar. On a larger scale

this can lead to the washing out of wall cores

and building collapse.

The susceptibility of a mortar to

binder leaching is dependent largely on its

composition. Calcium is present in lime

mortars in a number of forms: calcium

silicates (the primary hydraulic components

of natural hydraulic limes), calcium carbonate

(carbonated lime) and calcium hydroxide

(uncarbonated lime). The calcium in silicate

minerals is insoluble and is not affected by

leaching. Calcium carbonate and calcium

hydroxide, however, are both water-soluble

and as such can be leached (the lime ‘available’

for leaching from a binder is called free lime).

The leaching of calcium carbonate is a slow

process due to its relatively low solubility but,

where the right conditions exist, over time it

does occur. The solubility of calcium hydroxide

is much higher, which is why uncarbonated

mortars are more susceptible to leaching.

Where mortars are likely to be subjected

to percolation of water (for example in wall

heads and parapets), it is advisable to use a

binder with a low free lime content. However,

free lime does provide lime mortars with

positive performance attributes such as

flexibility and small-scale self-healing (on

very long timescales), so there is a balance to

be struck when selecting binders. Binders of

higher hydraulicity typically have lower free

lime contents, but variations do exist between

Petrographic thin section of a hot lime mortar with high porosity (indicated by

blue areas): note the partially slaked lime inclusion (left and centre)

Leaching of lime binder due to percolation of water, which has also resulted in

greening of masonry (Photo: Historic Environment Scotland)

Intra-inclusion

porosity

Lime

inclusion

Binder

Pore

Aggregate