Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  126 / 208 Next Page
Basic version Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 126 / 208 Next Page
Page Background

1 2 4

T H E B U I L D I N G C O N S E R VAT I O N D I R E C T O R Y 2 0 1 5

T W E N T Y S E C O N D E D I T I O N

3.3

STRUCTURE & FABR I C :

ME TAL ,

WOOD & GLASS

heartwood is more resistant to rot and beetle

infestation. When kept dry, English oak has

a longevity that no other native hardwood

species enjoys.

Historically, there has always been a

demand for English oak for construction and

periodically intense demand made it a scarce

commodity, particularly when demand for

timber for a major project removed all local

supplies. The supply of English oak for the

construction of the roof of one of the great

cathedrals during the middle-ages would have

placed a heavy demand on native resources.

In these circumstances, when home-

grown supplies were hard to come by, there is

evidence that local materials would have been

supplemented with oak from abroad. Examples

of imported oak timbers have been discovered

at Ely and York cathedrals alongside English

oak, and English merchants are recorded as

visiting and trading at the southern Baltic

ports of Elbing (now Elbląg, Poland), Danzig

(Gdansk, Poland) and Stralsund (Germany) as

early as 1350. By the 15th century Danzig was

one of the most important ports exporting

timber to England.

USE OF OAK

Much of the oak used in the timber frame

construction of dwellings was green oak. When

an oak tree is first felled moisture content

commonly accounts for half of its weight. The

dry weight of oak is constant at 650–800 kg per

cubic metre (40–50 lb per cubic foot) but it is

not unusual for a freshly felled oak to contain

the same weight again in water. In this case the

timber would be described as having a moisture

content of 100 per cent. (Moisture content is

measured by calculating the weight of the water

trapped in the cells of the wood as a percentage

of its dry weight, so wood can have a moisture

content in excess of 100 per cent.)

With such large quantities of water

trapped in the wood fibres it would have been

impossible to fully season the oak to a dry state

in the large sections required for use as beams,

girders, and posts, before the construction of

a timber frame building took place. Indeed,

the framing of many of the timber buildings

that survive today in East Anglia was cut and

fashioned with green oak. The carpenter would

have been very familiar with the benefits of

converting and working oak when it is green

(unseasoned) as it is much easier to cut and

fashion in this state. Oak continues to harden

as it dries and as part of the drying process it

will move and twist, tightening up the tenon in

the mortise joint and giving more strength to

the structure.

The size of the timber available was a

factor that influenced the scale of the building

or hall, in particular the width, which would

be governed by the length of timber required

for the tie beams. The height of the rooms

would also be influenced by the length of the

bole of oak for conversion to the required post

sizes. In the search for a large-section oak

with dimensions above 12 inches square for a

principal jowl post, the village carpenter had to

use a field oak.

Unlike the oak from managed woodland,

field oaks would have been much older as much

of its early growth was lateral, and the timber

would not be as straight. The timber was

converted by cutting or splitting the oak trunk

through the middle, lengthways, and upending

the timber to display the thickened end that

was originally towards the ground. The thick

section (or jowl) could then accommodate the

tenons of the tie beam and the wall plate. Each

tree chosen for this purpose would supply

a pair of jowl posts with enough length to

accommodate most secular dwellings.

THE DECLINE OF OAK AND THE

RISE OF SOFTWOODS

In the 17th century, the consumption of oak

for the Elizabethan housing boom, for fuel and

for naval ship-building placed even greater

demands on the native timber resource. The

absence of a reforestation policy compounded

Morden and Lea’s 1682 map of central London shows no timber wharfs on the banks of the Thames.

In contrast, John Rocque’s ‘plan of the cities of London and Westminster, and borough of Southwark’, dated

1746, shows the southern bank of the river lined with timber yards, timber merchants and framing yards, built

to supply England’s burgeoning demand for building timber.

Coppiced trees which have been cut back to the ‘stool’

then allowed to regenerate and, in the left foreground,

a ‘standard’ which has been left to grow on