Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  39 / 196 Next Page
Basic version Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 39 / 196 Next Page
Page Background

T W E N T Y T H I R D E D I T I O N

T H E B U I L D I N G C O N S E R VAT I O N D I R E C T O R Y 2 0 1 6

3 9

1

PROFESS IONAL SERV I CES

Just as important is the pressure difference on

either side of the meniscus: in ‘capillaries’ (fine

interlinked pores, cracks, or thin gaps between

flat materials) this is easily strong enough to

move water, and even lift it against gravity.

The mechanisms behind ‘capillary transfer’

were first understood by WTThompson

(later Lord Kelvin), who built on Young’s and

Laplace’s work on menisci. The curvature of a

meniscus depends on the forces between the

water and the surface it touches, so where these

forces are high, a drop of water on a surface

is quite flat, whereas on material with which

water does not interact the droplet will be

sharply curved.

It was Kelvin’s great insight that the Vp

of the air above the meniscus will depend on

this curvature – convex menisci raising the

Vp and concave menisci lowering it – and that

this could explain the behaviour of water in a

straw. The interaction with the straw’s walls

forms a concave meniscus that, for a thin straw,

reduces the Vp enough to lift the level of the

water considerably (it will rise until its weight

balances the force of the pressure difference).

The Vp above the meniscus will be lowered still

more by evaporation at the top of the straw (air

flow is one of the principal drivers of moisture

movement).

Capillary transfer is the main mechanism

by which trees bring water and nutrients

through their roots and up to their leaves,

and is often cited as a reason for ‘rising damp’

in buildings, but in fact permeable building

materials are very unlike trees: their pores are

not smooth but rough and chemically active,

and the pore structure is not ‘bundled straws’,

but interconnected, convoluted, broken, and

with many ‘mouths’ at the surface through

which water can evaporate (capillary forces

conduct water not just vertically but sideways

as well). Water therefore rises only a very small

distance (often no more than the first course of

bricks, since joints of all kinds are a barrier to

movement). For substantial capillary rise, a very

strong and persistent source of water is needed

(such as a broken water main or sewer), and this

must usually be coupled with a coating or finish

that slows or prevents evaporation (such as a

cement render).

WHAT HAPPENS IN THE PORES?

All these forces draw water into permeable

materials, and move them around. Inside

the pores, movement is also affected by

other many forces, notably electrochemical

reactions with the pore walls, and friction

with rough and convoluted surfaces.

Although it is impossible to observe exactly

what happens inside a permeable material,

we are fairly confident about the basic

processes that must be involved. As liquid

water or water vapour is drawn in, films

form on the surfaces of certain pores, and

these curved liquid surfaces reduce the

vapour pressure (Vp), drawing in yet more

water. If enough liquid collects, it begins to

flow through to the neighbouring pores.

Almost everything happening inside

the pores decreases the Vp, drawing in

moisture, and this is why ‘waterproof’

coatings can fail so spectacularly: they

cannot entirely stop water being pulled

in, but they do reduce evaporation, so

over time moisture levels build up.

Some forces resist the uptake of water,

most importantly the pressure of the air

in the pores. Some simple experiments on

bricks have shown that the pressure of the

air pushed through the pores ahead of water

rising by capillary action alone is around

1 bar. Air pressure has been shown to be the

cause of pipes bursting in cold weather, and

it seems reasonable to suspect that a similar

mechanism is involved in freeze-thaw damage,

and perhaps also in some of the damage

related to coatings and salt crystallisation.

Water will not be distributed evenly

throughout the pores: some capillaries may

fill, while others stay almost empty. Although

an analysis of a drilled core sample might

demonstrate that the fabric contains very

little water, what moisture there is might

be concentrated as a liquid in capillaries or

cracks through which it can move easily and

very quickly, carrying with it contaminants

such as salts. Moreover, the situation will

be dynamic, and can change very rapidly in

response to air temperature and humidity

changes, or air flow across the surface.

This explains the failure of many standard

laboratory tests – such as those for freeze-

thaw – to mimic the deterioration observable

in the field. Most tests require saturating the

sample, but in buildings complete saturation

is extremely rare. In fact, materials are

demonstrably much more at risk from salt

decay and freezing temperatures if their pore

structure contains air as well as water.

Water vapour in pores does not behave

like liquid water. Individual water molecules

will bounce around randomly, exactly as

they do in the air, and will not be affected

by gravity, or indeed the environmental

conditions outside the material. Collisions

with the pore walls will quickly lead to

condensation, so it is virtually impossible for a

Water will interact strongly with most surfaces. Left,

a droplet of water on a surface that is ‘hydrophilic’

(“water-loving”, so reacting with water molecules); right,

a droplet on a ‘hydrophobic’ surface.

‘Rising damp’ is an excellent example of how many different sources of moisture can produce very similar symptoms. At the right, this wall shows the classic symptoms often

attributed to capillary rise from groundwater: a zone of salt damage and staining, separating a dry area above from a wet area below. Closer examination shows that the majority

of the wall is fine – which it would not be if groundwater were the issue – and that the source is in fact run-off from a glass roof behind, saturating the wall and percolating

downwards. Other common causes of this damage pattern include splash-back and plumbing leaks.

For the same reason that a sponge must be slightly wet

if it is to soak up a spill, dry building materials resist

absorbing water. On the other hand, wet materials

will draw water in quickly: the ‘moisture history’ of the

material is therefore of paramount importance.