Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  20 / 62 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 20 / 62 Next Page
Page Background

20

BCD SPECIAL REPORT ON

HISTORIC CHURCHES

24

TH ANNUAL EDITION

decay. This contained lime putty,

Prompt natural cement, Westerham

sand and Bath stone dust in the

proportions 2:1:3:3 (lime: natural

cement: sand: stone dust).

4 Stone elements which were at risk of

falling because of their overhanging

position were replaced like-for-like

in Caen stone. Two such stones were

the shield bearing the city crest and

the Muscovy hat, both of which

had multiple fractures and were at

considerable risk of detachment.

Once the repairs were completed,

the whole area was given five coats

of specially colour-blended, casein-

bound limewash to unite the central

panel. This also helped to cover any

white bloom from the nanolime

and will further protect the fragile

nature of the carved work.

Remodelling selected areas of cement

repairs in lime mortar helped to slow

down the decay of the stone and the

nanolime definitely improved the many

flaky, friable surfaces on the panel,

providing a much firmer surface for

the application of limewash. Nanolime

consolidation seems a viable method

for surface protection but for deep

penetration it proved difficult to achieve

reliably. Tests indicated that the best

penetration achieved was 7mm using

Calosil E5 (illustrated above left), which

was generally considered sufficient to bind

the friable surfaces to sound substrate.

Better results have been obtained in

laboratory conditions. The environmental

factors of temperature and particularly

relative humidity (RH) have a major effect

on the time required for evaporation of

the ethanol and consequent depth that

nanolime is carried into the stone. Colder,

overcast days with high RH offer the best

conditions for obtaining good penetration

results on site.

Used in conjunction with

mortar repairs and limewashing, the

consolidating effect to the surface

provided an excellent ground to receive

further treatments of lime protection,

given that the friable stone surfaces are

not sound enough to bond properly with

mortar and limewash.

It is tempting to view nanolime as

a new wonder treatment. In practice,

however, its success depends on many

variables, including the pore structure

of the stone and the type of damage that

has occurred, as outlined in Historic

England’s new research publication.

In some stones, for example, the pore

structure may have limited continuity,

reducing the depth of penetration,

and larger gaps and fissures cannot

be bridged by nanolime alone, such

as where delamination has occurred.

The research also highlights problems

where limestones are covered by a

gypsum crust, as this layer can be almost

completely impermeable, and any

consolidation may actually be counter-

productive. Nevertheless, what nanolime

does offer is another weapon in an

arsenal of conservation materials, and

in many situations it can be used very

effectively in combination with other

lime products.

In this case, the entrance screen

certainly benefitted from this new

material in slowing down the complex

combination of decay mechanisms which

were eroding the central panel. Nanolime

is not suited to every situation but it does

offer an option to stave off the need to

replace original fabric and extend the life

of our historic structures without always

having to resort to stone replacement or

less sympathetic consolidants.

BEN NEWMAN

is a stonemason and project

manager for London Stone Conservation (see

page 21, a member of the SPAB’s Education

and Training Committee and a William

Morris Craft Fellow. He is also a Freeman of

The Worshipful Company of Masons and a

member of its Craft Training Committee.

Further Information

P D’Armada and E Hirst, ‘Nano-Lime

for Consolidation of Plaster and Stone’,

Journal of Architectural Conservation

,

Vol 18, No 1, 2012

JL Hull, ‘Can Nano-lime Stone

Consolidation offer a Feasible

Conservation Method for Limestone

Ecclesiastical Buildings?’, University

of the West of England, Bristol, 2012

(http://bc-url.com/stone-consolidation)

D Odgers et al,

Nanolime: A Practical

Guide to its Use for Consolidating

Weathered Limestone,

Historic England

2017

(http://bc-url.com/nanolime)

J Otero et al, ‘An Overview of Nanolime as

a Consolidation Method for Calcareous

Substrates’, Sheffield Hallam University,

2016

(http://bc-url.com/nano-lime

)

The depth of penetration of the nanolime was gauged

with the use of phenolphthalein, which turns pink in

the presence of un-carbonated lime. The sample of

stone treated with the nanolime was cut in half and

sprayed with the indicator: the depth of penetration

is clearly seen.

Nanolime was applied with a pressurised garden

spray and the area was covered in cling-film between

applications to delay evaporation of the ethanol and

promote maximum penetration.

The central crest after consolidation and repair: note the new stone shield, Muscovy hat, copings and foliate

corbels with nanolime consolidation and limewash.